Blogs

RSS

30 June 2009 10:40 AM

The most enigmatic of recessions

What should we make of the Spring rebound in the London property market? According to Nationwide prices were almost 5% higher in June than in April. Some agents say there has been a 10% bounce off the bottom in parts of the capital. It is typical of this most enigmatic of recessions.

On the one hand there is the Private Fraser tendency: otherwise sober commentators who get their kicks from cheering the country with their "we're all doomed, doomed I tell you" warnings. For them it is either the worst downturn since the War, the Thirties Depression, for 100 years or since the Great Flood. I don't know and neither do they.

On the other there are the anecdotal stories from the frontline of the real economy, which paint a very different picture. One household name luxury retailer told me this morning that like-for-like sales are up 20% this year. And not just in London where you might expect the tourist dollar to artificially inflate takings. No, he told me the picture was the same all over the country. In fact the strongest performance of all is in Manchester. It is the same story on fine dining, where Gordon Ramsay, for all his travails, is still doing record business at his London restaurants.

You don't spend that sort of money on what are essentially fripperies, if you really think that it is time to hunker down. So why the discrepancy? One theory of mine is that it is simply so long since the last recession that no-one under 40 can remember it as a fully fledged participating member of the economy. They still don't quite believe what the eco-Cassandras are telling them. They're used to spending easy money and can't give up the habit when they don't have to.

The over-40s, by contrast, grew up in an era of perpetual economic crisis and are more easily persuaded that the bad times have returned. The length of the upturn also meant that many people were able to accumulate such huge cash resources that they are essentially recession proof in a way that far fewer were in the Eighties and early Nineties.

Don't forget also that 93% of the working population still have jobs and of those perhaps a quarter are substantially better off because of falls in mortgage rates. Again that is in contrast to recessions of yore.

None of this is particularly scientific. Every recession has its own peculiar characteristics. If the early Eighties was a failure of industry, the early Nineties a failure of property, then this one if perhaps a failure of banking. Whether that makes it easier to contain and recover from only time will tell. Perhaps another Dads Army catch-phrase is the appropriate response: Don't Panic

 

Bookmark and Share

 

Comments

smell the coffee

The enigma of UK reccessions? hmmm.....

Having been through the over 40s experience as you point out, I agree with most of your comment. As a long-time Cassandra of the current meltdown, and a quasi-Cassandra of the previous 80/90s crash, I feel the current crisis/reccession will outweigh the previous 2 by about 200%. Given the current financial mess is a) Global, b) Based on credit of assets that simply does not exist and therefore will take years to correct. c) The debt mountain is so so much larger than any mere mortals can understand d) The Keynsesian policy (Taken by the Western Economies) whilst softening the fall, could prolong the downtown for years. (As it did in the 30's according to some commentators.)

As this relates to UK property values, it will take a few years but prices will eventually come down to reasonable levels, according to long term averages.

IMHO of course.

Scopulus

Your sentiment are of a sane man in a rational world with common sense being common.


But we don't live in a rational world and common sense is not that common. The media has had it part to play with their doom and gloom fixers under the banner of "the public want to be informed and they also want the truth". But which version and how it is told...(10 times a day 7 days a week)


Confidence has been the biggest killer in this recession with the fear of losing our homes and jobs(the biggest asset most have and the only source of income). The housing boom gave people an inflated sense of worth.


The reality of the situation is that peoples perception will determine their behavior and spending habits.


The media has it's role, how it plays it is up to them...

Darius Midwinter

This downturn/recession/depression (tick box depending on your perspective) will no doubt be remembered as the on caused by greed and feckless behaviour en-mass, (as was one in `29), and the failure of governments to heed the middle classes (mid income taxpayers) unrest at not lancing the boil, but re-seeding the problem to stay in power.
Many are still spending hard, the cut in rates have seen to that - they are the ones who have made a killing by borrowing too much, sitting on their property "investment" whilst it’s "value" accrues at three to five times the rate of inflation, having done nothing to add this value yet still benefiting from it.
The rest endure near zero savings rates, and they and their children are expected to subsidise the whole sorry mess in future taxation policy.
Now we learn that those same people will not pay inheritance tax, (on the property they have done nothing except wait in order to acquire years of unearned income on) despite their ability - so we and our children must, by virtue of paying their state pension and health/homecare, effectively subsidise their offspring’s inheritance!
This situation must be reversed, as, in the current economic climate, it does not bode well for the tolerance to this strand of society of the generations of unsubsidised non-house owning taxpayers to come...
Remember, world war ended the last depression - we must gaurd against civil unrest prolonging this one.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.